Legal Opinion
Pallma v. Fox
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 8, 1950No. 21568_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Chief Judge.
The plaintiffs appeal because of its inadequacy from a judgment in their favor in an action brought upon a written contract with the defendants, entered into on March 20, 1928, by which they sold their business as publishers of musical compositions. Part of the property sold was the copyrights of 29 musical compositions: 3 piano solos, 1 violin solo, 3 organ solos and 22 songs. That part of the contract out of which this action arose we quote in the margin. 1 The plaintiff, Pallma, had been in the defendants’ employ, but had left them in 1925 to form the plaintiff firm.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Burton v. DriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- United States v. MortimerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Pappathanos v. CoakleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Rollins v. Board of Com'rsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- Trafikatiedolaget Grangesberg Oxelosand v. Ainesworth Coal & Iron Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1922
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hancock v. CrouchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
- Lenda J. WRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHWEST BANK, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Newby v. Enron Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2002
- ACE American Insurance v. Ascend One Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- Phelan v. Middle States Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.