Legal Opinion

Neal v. Brown

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 13, 2007No. 4275PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, J.

This appeal arises out of David Neal’s second permit application for a dock. Neal appeals the circuit court’s order affirming the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management’s (OCRM’s) Coastal Zone Management Appellate Panel’s (Appellate Panel’s) decision that had the effect of denying him the dock permit. We reverse.

FACTS

In 1997, three adjacent parcels of land, located at 111 Hibben Street (the property), in Mount Pleasant, were conveyed to Neal Brothers, Inc., a company in which Neal was a part owner. The three parcels had all been owned by the Mclver family since 1930. The property had…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Brown v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  2. Dunton v. South Carolina Board of ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  3. Grant v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  4. Ray Bell Construction Co. v. School DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  5. Northern Ind. Pub. Serv. Co. v. McCOY ET UX.Indiana Supreme Court · 1959

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Original Blue Ribbon Taxi Corp. v. South Carolina Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  2. Olson v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Neal v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  4. Johnson v. BEAUTY UNLIMITED LANDSCAPE CO.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  5. Neal v. BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API