Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Rexam Beverage Can Co.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided June 18, 2007No. 2:06-cv-00225PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT (DOC. 12). THE COURT GRANTS REXAM’S MOTION TO DISMISS IP TECHNOLOGIES WITH RESPECT TO THE BREACH OF CONTRACT CLAIM (COUNT II) FOR LACK OF STANDING. THE COURT GRANTS REXAM’S MOTION TO DISMISS WILLIAMSON FOR LACK OF STANDING WITH RESPECT TO THE MISAPPROPRIATION OF TRADE SECRETS (COUNT I), VIOLATION OF THE LANHAM ACT (COUNT III) AND TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE WITH PROSPECTIVE ECONOMIC ADVANTAGE AND BUSINESS RELATIONS (COUNT IV) CLAIMS. THE COURT GRANTS THE MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT III…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. MMK GROUP, LLC v. SheShells Co., LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
  2. Great American Life Insurance Company v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
  3. Lewis v. Acuity Real Estate Services, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
  4. Roof Maxx Technologies LLC v. HolsingerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
  5. Roof Maxx Technologies LLC v. RourkDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API