Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gordon v. J. L. Manta, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 19, 1972No. 55137Published

1Dissent

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE DIERINGER,

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion for the following reasons. I cannot agree that the special interrogatory was properly given. It is conceded by all parties that self-defense is an affirmative defense shifting the burden of proof to the defendant. Plaintiff’s instruction No. 24, which was given, reads:

“A person in the sole control, possession and management of a deadly weapon at the time it explodes and injures another has the burden of showing that such explosion was not by any negligence or guilt on his part, or was in the exercise…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wicks v. Cuneo-Henneberry Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Devine v. Federal Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Hocking v. RehnquistAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  4. Knapik v. StefekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API