Legal Opinion
United States v. ONE 1955 OLDSMOBIUE SEDAN "98"
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 15, 1960No. Misc. No. 2462PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARSH, District Judge.
On January 22, 1960, pursuant to Rule 41(e), Fed.R.Crim.P., 18 U.S.C.A., Roland Willis, owner of the above captioned motor vehicle, moved for a return of his property, alleging that it had been illegally seized on November 20, 1959, in violation of his constitutional rights. Service of the motion was accepted by the United States Attorney. At the hearing it appeared that the motor vehicle on that date was seized from John Pittman for alleged violation of § 7301, Title 26 U.S. C.A. (I.R.C.1954), by agents of the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax Division of the Internal Revenue…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re BehrensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- United States v. Plymouth Coupe (1941) Serial No. 15051526Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- United States v. One 1953 Oldsmobile Sedan, Motor No. R376229, Serial No. 539A5536District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1955
- De Bonis v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
- Milkint v. MorgenthauCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Harold Wellington Rapp, Harold Wellington Rapp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Philip R. FilingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- GrimmUnited States Court of Claims · 1966