Legal Opinion
Barclays Bank P.C. v. 865 Centennial Avenue Associates Ltd. Partnership
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 3, 1998No. 96-5747 (JAG)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREENAWAY, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the motion for partial summary judgment of Cooper, Rose & English, LLP, counsel for defendanVcounterelaimant Mazda Motor of America, Inc. (“Mazda”). The other motion before the Court is the cross-motion for summary judgment of Berger & Bornstein, P.A., counsel for defendant/eross-claimant 865 Centennial Avenue Associates Limited Partnership (“865 Centennial”).
FACTS
The following facts are undisputed. 865 Centennial is the owner or former owner of a certain industrial building and premises located at 865 Centennial Avenue,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- North River Insurance Company v. Cigna Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Karl R. Smith v. Pittsburgh Gage and Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Siegel Transfer, Inc. v. Carrier Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re WechslerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2000
- Heir v. Delaware River Port AuthorityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- SINGH RADCLIFF v. RADCLIFFDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020