Legal Opinion

Miley v. Marshall

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided October 18, 1951No. Misc. No. 711PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYAN, District Judge.

Contending that he has served the full time required by his commission and the acts of Congress under which he was appointed, the petitioner, a captain, seeks release from the Army of the United States through habeas corpus. Respondents are the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of the Army, and the Chief of Staff, United States Army, all of whom have appeared and by their return to the writ have denied that the petitioner’s period of duty has expired.

He was appointed to his present rank for five years, commencing July 31, 1946, while this country was in a state of war…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miley v. Lovett, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
  2. O'Connor v. EppigNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  3. State v. GibsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API