Legal Opinion

Morrissey v. Ottman

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 25, 1961No. File No. CV 16-615-427Published

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

This appeal is from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs allowing recovery for the balance due on a promissory note. The defendant has been held liable in his capacity as guarantor.

The defendant was president of General Sand & Stone Corporation, the maker of the note. The plaintiffs are insurance agents who had paid sums of money for insurance premiums on behalf of the *141corporation. The indebtedness thus created was represented by the note, which called for periodic payments to plaintiffs. The corporation was in poor financial condition. At the time in question, it was under the personal care…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Robey v. Walton Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Tyler v. WaddinghamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  3. Maglione v. PentaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Cape Charles Bank, Inc. v. Farmers Mutual Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1917
  5. Beardsley v. HawesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API