Legal Opinion

Henning v. McAdam

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 13, 1923No. 23,293PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

Action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien in which plaintiff and other lien claimant parties had judgment, and defendants John Y. McAdam and Marion H. McAdam, husband and wife, appealed from an order denying a new trial.

The facts are in dispute in one important respect only. It appears that of date July 11, 1921, defendant John V. McAdam, the fee owner of the premises in question, entered into an executory contract to sell and convey the same to one Robinson, upon the terms and conditions of future performance specified in the contract, which was in writing. Robinson, a contractor and builder,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Menzel v. TubbsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Wheaton v. BergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Atlas Lumber Co. v. DupuisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. Jefferson v. LeithauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  5. Morrison County Lumber Co. v. DuclosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fauser v. McElroySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  2. Master Asphalt Co. v. Voss Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API