Legal Opinion

Fauser v. McElroy

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 16, 1923No. 23,491PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

By a written contract, dated February 26, 1920, the defendant Guy A. Thomas agreed to sell and convey to F. A. McConnell a house and lot in Minneapolis. The purchaser paid $250 and was to pay $3,250 more, on or before April 29, 1920, when a deed should be delivered in which the purchaser was to assume the payment of a $15,000 mortgage on the premises. The contract provided that possession should not be given until the payment mentioned had been made. The defendant McElroy acted for the purchaser, his sister, defendant McConnell. Mr. Thomas owned only an undivided one-half, but had authority…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Meyer v. BerlandiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  2. Wheaton v. BergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Johnson v. SolidayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Moody v. TschaboldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  5. Jefferson v. LeithauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. New Prague Lumber & Readi-Mix Co. v. BastyrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. Albuquerque Lumber Co. v. Montevista Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Anderson v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  4. Bruer Lumber Co. v. KenyonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Couture v. HennessySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API