Legal Opinion

Bank of America, N.A. v. Inda

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 8, 2013No. 107,999PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Green, J.:

Bank of America, the mortgage note holder, brought an action to foreclose on Dennis Inda’s mortgage after he defaulted on his loan. The trial court granted Bank of America’s motion for summaiy judgment, finding that Bank of America was the holder of the note (Note) and the mortgage (Mortgage) and that Inda had defaulted on the loan. We affirm.

On March 30, 2007, Inda executed and delivered the Note to Pulaski Bank (Pulaski), promising to pay Pulaski the principal sum of $244,000 plus interest in monthly installments. As security for the Note, Inda and his wife, Jacque Gichuki, signed…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. State v. McCaslinSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. BrembySupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  4. BOARD OF COM'RS OF SUMNER COUNTY v. BrembySupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  5. Bomhoff v. Nelnet Loan Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. HindsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  2. FV-I, Inc. v. KallevigSupreme Court of Kansas · 2017
  3. Kidd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API