Legal Opinion

Troxall v. Applegarth

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 13, 1866PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Al’I’kal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. The facts of this case are stated in the opinion of this Court-

1Opinion of the CourtGoldsborough, J.

The appellants, the.plaintiffs below, obtained a judgment against Samuel R. Dunnock, in 1859, for $1,015, and by way of execution issued an attachment out of the Superior Court of Baltimore City on the 20th of January, 1860.

This attachment was, on the 21st of January, 1860, laid on certain alleged rights and credits of the defendant Dunnock in the hands of William Applegarth one of the appellees. He appeared as garnishee, and pleaded nulla hona. At the trial, the plaintiffs moved the Court to order a non pros, as to John Whittington ; the same was ordered and *178the cause conducted against…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Rail Road v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
  2. Waters' Lessee v. RigginCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1863

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fuller v. J. B. Brewster & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
  2. Pen Mar Co. v. AshmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  3. In Re BresnanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1930
  4. Shanks v. LoweCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Shanks v. LoweCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API