Legal Opinion

Shanks v. Lowe

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 25, 2001No. 103, Sept. Term, 2000Published

1Dissent 1

Dissenting Opinion by ELDRIDGE, J., in which CATHELL, and BATTAGLIA, JJ., join.

2Dissent · EldridgeEldridge, Judge

I disagree with the Court’s conclusion that cash tips paid directly to an employee by a customer constitute “wages” for the purpose of Maryland’s wage garnishment law. Today’s decision is unsound and contrary to previous opinions by this Court. For the reasons discussed below, I would affirm.

It is well-established in Maryland that “[a] garnishment proceeding is, in essence, an action by the judgment debtor for the benefit of the judgment creditor which is brought against a third party, the garnishee, who holds the…

3Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Cole v. Randall Park Holding Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  2. Fico, Inc. v. GhingherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Hoffman Chevrolet, Inc. v. Washington County National Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  4. Belcher v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. Messall v. Suburban Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1966

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API