Shanks v. Lowe
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Dissent 1
Dissenting Opinion by ELDRIDGE, J., in which CATHELL, and BATTAGLIA, JJ., join.
2Dissent · EldridgeEldridge, Judge
I disagree with the Court’s conclusion that cash tips paid directly to an employee by a customer constitute “wages” for the purpose of Maryland’s wage garnishment law. Today’s decision is unsound and contrary to previous opinions by this Court. For the reasons discussed below, I would affirm.
It is well-established in Maryland that “[a] garnishment proceeding is, in essence, an action by the judgment debtor for the benefit of the judgment creditor which is brought against a third party, the garnishee, who holds the…
3Cases cited22 opinions
- Cole v. Randall Park Holding Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Fico, Inc. v. GhingherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Hoffman Chevrolet, Inc. v. Washington County National Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Belcher v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Messall v. Suburban Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.