Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Spaulding v. Watt

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1992No. 20853PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In this original proceeding in prohibition the relator, the State of West Virginia, prays that this Court prohibit the respondent, Clarence L. Watt, Judge of the Circuit Court of Putnam County, from providing respondent Mark J. McClelland with a new trial on certain criminal charges. The State claims that respondent McClelland has not made an adequate showing for a new trial and that, given the particular circumstances of the case, the circuit judge exceeded his legitimate powers in granting a new trial. After reviewing the documents filed and the questions presented, this Court agrees and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Halstead v. HortonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. State v. HamricWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. FrazierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. LewisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. CatlettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Spaulding v. WattWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. SER Universal Underwriters & Zurich American Insurance. v. Hon. Patrick WilsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2019
  3. SER Universal Underwriters & Zurich American Insurance. v. Hon. Patrick WilsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State Ex Rel. Spaulding v. WattWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State of West Virginia ex rel. Scott R. Smith, Prosecuting Attorney for Ohio County v. The Honorable Michael OlejaszWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API