Legal Opinion
Hart v. Freeman & Sons, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 30, 1969No. 69-367PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiff below, Robert F. Hart, appeals from an order of the trial court which dismissed his complaint without leave to amend on the ground that the written document attached to the complaint was not subject to specific performance.
The plaintiff, Hart, sued the defendant, Freeman & Sons, Inc., a Florida corporation, and demanded judgment for specific *709performance and for damages. He attached to his complaint the following writ-, ten document upon which he based his claim for specific performance:
“February 4th, 1969
Received of Mr. Robert F. Hart the sum of $5,000.00 as Binder on the Sale…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rundel v. GordonSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Lasseter v. DauerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Bliss v. HallockDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
- Purcell v. RothmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bay Club, Inc. v. BRICKELL BAY CLUBDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Nichols v. MoAmCo CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Picard v. BurroughsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Venema v. TostDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Tumulty v. SeverdijaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.