Legal Opinion

Venema v. Tost

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 20, 1982No. Nos. 81-1653, 81-1979PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We reverse the order of the trial court granting specific performance upon a holding that the contract upon which enforcement is sought does not sufficiently describe the real property in question and, thus, is not capable of specific performance. Florida Bank & Trust Co. at West Palm Beach v. Field, 157 Fla. 261, 25 So.2d 663 (1946); Fox v. Sails At Laguna Club Development Corp., 403 So.2d 456 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Hart v. Freeman & Sons, Inc., 226 So.2d 708 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969); see also Farrell v. Phillips, 414 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); The Bay Club, Inc. v. Brickell Bay Club, Inc., 293…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hunt v. First Nat. Bank of TampaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. Dehuy v. OsborneSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  3. Fox v. Sails at Laguna Club Dev. Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Bay Club, Inc. v. BRICKELL BAY CLUBDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  5. Connelly v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jordan v. BoisvertDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Boardwalk at Daytona Development, LLC v. PaspalakisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. Venema v. TostDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. LLOYD L. BOWEIN v. JOHN SHERMAN AND IRENE SHERMANDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API