Legal Opinion
South San Joaquin Irrigation District v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 22, 2008No. C056661PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORRISON, J.
South San Joaquin Irrigation District (the District) planned to increase the services it offered by adding retail electric service. It unsuccessfully sought approval for the plan from the San Joaquin County Local Agency Formation Commission (SJ LAFCO). The District now contends approval from SJ LAFCO is unnecessary because SJ LAFCO has no power to authorize new service by a special district in its existing territory. It further contends SJ LAFCO approval is not required because, since the District already provided wholesale electric service, retail electric service is not a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kaufman & Broad Communities, Inc. v. Performance Plastering, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Torres v. Parkhouse Tire Service, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Duke Energy Trading and Marketing, L.L.C. v. Gray Davis, Governor of the State of California, and California Power Exchange CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Gattuso v. Harte-Hanks Shoppers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Hollman v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- San Joaquin County Local Agency Formation Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Water Replenishment District of Southern California v. City of CerritosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012