Legal Opinion

Blohm v. Hannan

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided September 29, 1913PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On bill to foreclose.

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, V. C.

The complainant in this case seeks to foreclose a mortgage of fifteen hundred dollars ($1,500) given by the defendants. The answer admits the execution of the bond and mortgage but denies that the amount of money claimed or any other sum was due to the complainant.

The transaction between the parties had its origin when Slipper agreed with Hannan that he would loan, first, seventy-five hundred dollars ($7,500), out of which he was to get fifteen per cent, for making the loan, and later would loan twenty-five hundred dollars ($2,500), out of which he was to get fifteen per cent, for…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lamb v. HerndonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Bomar v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Credit Finance Corp. v. MoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Kobrin v. HullNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API