Legal Opinion

Commonwealth, Aplt v. Hackett, R.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 18, 2014No. 675 CAPPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice STEVENS.

Following our remand in this capital case, the Commonwealth appeals the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County granting Appellee Richard Hackett’s petition pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA).1 Upon determining that Appellee has proven that he is “mentally retarded” as defined by this Court in Commonwealth v. Miller, 585 Pa. 144, 888 A.2d 624 (2005), and thus, is exempt from execution in accordance with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 122 S.Ct. 2242, 153 L.Ed.2d 335 (2002), the PCRA court…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Mills v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Hall v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Commonwealth v. HackettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Mason, L., ApltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Commonwealth v. SwopeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Commonwealth v. Cox, R., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Ex parte MooreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
  5. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Bracey, E.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API