James Williams, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Valentec Kisco, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.
James Williams prevailed in his claim that he was discharged by Valentec Kisco, Inc., because of his age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621-34 (1988 & West Supp.1991). However, the jury rejected his claim brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (1988) that he was also discharged because of his race, and the magistrate judge 1 who tried the case entered a similar judgment on his Title VII race claim brought under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 (1988). Valentec Kisco argues on appeal that it was entitled to judgment notwithstanding the…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Cabrera v. JakabovitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Webb v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- 66 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 13, 65 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,344, 18 Employee Benefits Cas. 2408 Thomas Dean Smith, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. World Insurance Company, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Gaworski v. ITT Commercial Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Betty ROUSH, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KFC NATIONAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.