Ray v. State

GRAVES, Judge.

This cause has been before this court in our No. 24,292, decided March 16, 1949, and is reported in (page 347 of this volume) 221 S. W. (2d) 249.

Its decision caused quite an amount of deliberation by the court and was eventually affirmed, the Presiding Judge filing a dissenting opinion.

When the mandate of this court was returned to the trial court, it was ascertained that no judgment had been pronounced against the defendant in the lower court. Thereupon the state filed a motion nunc pro tunc to enter such judgment now for then. This motion was granted and a judgment therein…