Legal Opinion
United States v. Bayer Company
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 10, 1955PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
In this action charging violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act 1 the government moves for summary judgment against the defendant General Aniline & Film Corporation, hereinafter called “General Aniline”. General Aniline cross-moves for summary judgment in its favor.
The motions are based on the pleadings, exhibits, requests for admissions, answers to interrogatories and affidavits. Each party in support of its motion urges that no genuine issue exists as to any material fact and that it is entitled to prevail.
The action has had a rather long history. General Aniline was…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lektro-Vend Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. The Vendo Company, a Missouri CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975
- United States v. Bethlehem Steel CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Farbenfabriken Bayer A.G. v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Reines Distributors, Inc. v. Admiral CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.