Legal Opinion
Posttape Associates v. Eastman Kodak Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 27, 1978No. Civ. A. 72-1009PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HUYETT, District Judge.
This suit arises out of a sale of motion picture film by defendant Eastman Kodak Co. (Kodak) to plaintiff Posttape Associates (Posttape), a limited partnership formed to produce a documentary film. In the first trial of this case, the jury found that the film had been manufactured negligently and that the parties had not agreed to limit the manufacturer’s liability to replacement of the film. We denied defendant’s post trial motions. Posttape Associates v. Eastman Kodak Co., 68 F.R.D. 323 (E.D.Pa. 1975) . The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Lawrence B. Thomas, and Cross-Appellant v. E. J. Korvette, Inc., and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Posttape Associates v. Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- K & C, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Phillips Home Furnishings, Inc. v. Continental BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Trinity Industries, Inc. v. McKinnon Bridge Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- New York State Electric & Gas Corp. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Lobianco v. Property Protection, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Borden, Inc. v. Advent Ink Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Akilah Louise Wofford v. M.J. Edwards & Sons Funeral Home Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.