Isaacks v. Clayton
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Justice.
Complainant Isaacks has appealed from a final decree determining a disputed boundary line between coterminous tracts of land, in which decree the court established the line as contended for by the defendant, Clayton. § 2, Title 47, Code 1940; § 129, Title 13, Code 1940.
It is not necessary to describe the disputed area of land other than to observe that the complainant’s land was south and the respondent’s land north of the disputed line. The area in dispute was about thirty or thirty-five feet in width and extended across a part of the SE % of Section 14, Township 16 South,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ray v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Branyon v. KirkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Brantley v. HeltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Duke v. WimberlySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Gunn v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- James v. MizellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Bagley v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
- Mintz v. MillicanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- W. T. Smith Lumber Company v. CobbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Lewis v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.