Legal Opinion
Meischke-Smith v. Wardell
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 12, 1923No. 3818PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Circuit Judge.
This case is before the court upon a writ of error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.
Plaintiffs in error (plaintiffs below) are the trustees in dissolution of the Valley Pipe Line Company, dissolved April 21, 1919, by decree of the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco.
The defendant in error, Justus S. Wardell, was collector of internal revenue for the First district of California prior to November, 1917, and up to December 31, 1920. John L. Flynn and John P. McLaughlin, the other defendants in error, have…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Knowlton v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- McCray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Billings v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Southern Pacific Co. v. LoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Alexander v. Cosden Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- National Hotel Co. v. MotleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Slater v. Shell Oil CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Motter v. Derby Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- State v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.