Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Town of Durham

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 26, 2006PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

[¶ 1] In this case, we review again whether Maine’s tuition payment statute, 20-A M.R.S. § 2951(2) (2005), violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. The statute authorizes the use of public funds to pay tuition at approved private schools on behalf of students who live in districts that do not operate a public high school, provided the school is nonsectarian. We upheld section 2951(2) against a constitutional challenge in Bagley v. Raymond School Department, 1999 ME 60, 728 A.2d 127. The plaintiffs assert that a subsequent decision of the United States…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. John Doe I v. Robert WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
  2. IMS Health Inc. v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  3. State of Maine v. Thomas BennettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  4. Carson v. MakinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
  5. Maine School Administrative District No. 37 v. PineoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API