Legal Opinion
Maine School Administrative District No. 37 v. Pineo
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided February 18, 2010No. Docket: Was-09-330PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.
[¶ 1] Vance Pineo and Arthur Tatange-lo, Selectmen in the Towns of Columbia Falls and Cherryfield, respectively, appeal from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Washington County, Cvddy, J.) that denied their motion to stay execution of a preliminary injunction. That injunction ordered them and the other selectmen of each town to countersign and post warrants and notices of election regarding the closing of the Columbia Falls and Cherry-field elementary schools within Maine School Administrative District No. 37 (MSAD 37). Pineo and Tatangelo contend that the court erred both in granting…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- King Resources Co. v. Environmental Improvement CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
- Halfway House, Inc. v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Anderson v. Town of DurhamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- Windham Land Trust v. JeffordsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- Maine Civil Liberties Union v. City of South PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mainers for Fair Bear Hunting v. Department of Inland Fisheries and WildlifeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
- Anthem Health Plans of Maine, Inc. v. Superintendent of InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- Thornton Academy v. Regional School Unit 21Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
- Tenants Harbor General Store, LLC v. Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- Anthem Health Plans of Maine, Inc. v. Superintendent of InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.