Legal Opinion

Ferrari, Alvarez, Olsen & Ottoboni v. Home Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 8, 1991No. Nos. 89-16299, 89-16397PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CANBY, Circuit Judge:

Home Insurance Company appeals the district court order remanding this case to the state court from which it was removed. The law firm of Ferrari, Alvarez, Olsen & Ottoboni, and a member of the firm, Edward Alvarez, (collectively “the Law Firm” or “plaintiffs”), cross-appeal the district court’s ruling denying their request for costs and fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). The central issue on appeal is whether the Law Firm and Home Insurance orally agreed to litigate bad-faith claims in state court. We reverse on Home Insurance’s appeal and affirm on the Law Firm’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

Pelleport Investors, Inc. v. Budco Quality Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
Miller v. Safeco Title Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
The Clorox Company v. The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Carol Stower, Real PartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
Regis Associates v. Rank Hotels (Management) LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
Gregory v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Ferrari, Alvarez, Olsen & Ottoboni, a California Professional Corporation Edward M. Alvarez, an Individual, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees v. The Home Insurance Company, a New Hampshire Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant. Ferrari, Alvarez, Olsen & Ottoboni, a California Professional Corporation Edward M. Alvarez, an Individual, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellants v. The Home Insurance Company, a New Hampshire Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991