Legal Opinion

Louisville City Railway Co. v. City of Louisville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 28, 1868PublishedCited by 5 opinions

CASE 49 — PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. CITED— New city charter of Louisville, p. 93. Constitution of Kentucky, sec. 37, art. 11. Act incorporating appellant, and contract with the city by ordinance. [No brief in records.]

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE ROBERTSON

delivered the opinion oe the court:

A legislative act of February 15th, 1864; incorporating the “Louisville City Railway Company,” authorized it to construct and “ operate,” with the consent of the city council, street railways, “in such manner and on such terms” as the council, “by contract or otherwise,” should prescribe. Accordingly, the city council and. the railway company, on the 9th of March, 1864, made a contract containing many stipulations, the ninth of which is in the following words: “The said Louisville City Railway Company shall, for the franchise and privilege…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. City of Newport v. South Covington & Cincinnati Street Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
  3. City of Louisville v. Louisville Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  4. Berea College Utilities v. City of BereaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1985
  5. In re WatsonDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API