Legal Opinion

Boyce v. Watson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 28, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Memorandum.—Action of covenant in Circuit Court of Vermilion County; the Hon. Edward P. Vail, Judge, presiding. Trial by the court; finding for plaintiff $1,000; judgment; appeal by defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Boggs

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The covenant of these parties only required the plaintiff in error to abstain from the exercise of his calling for a limited time in a particular place.

The restriction was not violative of public policy but was valid.

This principle is so familiar and well recognized that it needs no citation of authorities in its support.

Another principle applicable to this contention is declared in Gobble v. Linder, 76 Ill. 157, to be equally well settled, and that is if the parties to an agreement have named in the instruments a sum as a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gobble v. LinderIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Merica v. BurgetIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Bauwens v. GoethalsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1914
  3. Berger v. NantsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  4. Lippman v. GraberAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API