Legal Opinion
Woodstock Hunt Club v. Hindi
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided September 11, 1997No. 2—96—1288, 2—96—1342, 2—96—1343 consPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McLAREN
In this consolidated case, defendants Steven and Carol Gross appeal the trial court’s grant of a permanent injunction enjoining them from violating the Hunter Interference Prohibition Act (Act) (720 ILCS 125/0.01 et seq. (West 1996)). Defendant Steven Hindi appeals his conviction of indirect criminal contempt of court and his sentence of 180 days in jail. We affirm.
On October 11, 1996, plaintiffs filed a petition for injunctive relief and a complaint for damages, alleging that defendants had violated the Act by, among other things, using sirens, bullhorns, and an engine-powered glider to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- In re Marriage of BettsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- People v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. LilburnMontana Supreme Court · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. SandersIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. RokickiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Van Breemen v. Department of Professional RegulationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Woodstock Hunt Club v. HindiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- United States Ex Rel. Hindi v. Warden of McHenry County JailDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.