Legal Opinion

Woodstock Hunt Club v. Hindi

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 9, 1999No. 2—-98—1327PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rapp

Defendants Steven Jay Gross and Carol Gross appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion to dissolve a permanent injunction and to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint. For the second time, they ask us to hold that the Hunter Interference Prohibition Act (Act) (720 ILCS 125/0.01 et seq. (West 1996)) is unconstitutional. Once again, we decline to do so. We therefore affirm the trial court’s order.

Members of the Woodstock Hunt Club (club) pay to hunt on club property. On October 11, 1996, plaintiffs filed a petition for injunctive relief and a complaint for damages, alleging that defendants used…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Cates v. CatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. SandersIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Woodstock Hunt Club v. HindiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. TrimarcoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  2. People v. HubbardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  3. People v. HubbardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  4. People v. TrimarcoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  5. People v. TrimarcoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API