Legal Opinion

Dubin v. Robert Newhall Chesebrough Trust

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 2002No. B146020PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL (C. S.), P. J.

Introduction

Plaintiff and appellant Gary Dubin, doing business as Alert Auto, appeals from a judgment entered upon the trial court’s sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend to plaintiff’s complaint arising out of an alleged interference with an easement; plaintiff also appeals from a postjudgment order awarding attorney fees in favor of defendants. Defendants and respondents are Chesebrough Brothers, LLC, as ultimate successor in interest to the Robert Newhall Chesebrough Trust, H.L. “Larry” Plumer (Plumer), Wespac Management Group, Inc. (Wespac), Robert…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Elliott v. McCombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Owsley v. HamnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Los Angeles Brick & Clay Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Buehler v. Oregon-Washington Plywood Corp.California Supreme Court · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McBride v. Smith, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Muzzi v. Bel Air MartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. McBride v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
  4. Osborne v. YasmehCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API