Hunt v. Bankers & Shippers Insurance

*940OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

We are constrained to affirm the order of the Appellate Division, with costs.

It is appellant’s contention that no consequential damages should have been awarded. In returning substantial verdicts for plaintiff it may be that the jury considered legally impermissible elements of such damages when it determined the total amount of damages. In the procedural posture in which the case reaches us it is impossible to determine whether the jury did in fact consider any such elements, and in any event we may not look behind the verdicts of the triers of the facts. The…