Legal Opinion

Whitacre Investment Co. v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1997No. 29401; No. 29477; No. 29549PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Young, L:

The issue of whether Justice Robert Rose is disqualified because of animus toward Laura FitzSimmons, a party’s attorney, *1103was presented and decided in the recent case of Las Vegas Downtown Redev. Agency v. Hecht, 113 Nev. 644, 940 P.2d 134 (1997). Laura FitzSimmons is one of the attorneys for appellant Whitacre Investment Company, respondents Buckwalter, et al., and appellant C.B.M., Ltd. (collectively “movants”), and they again assert that Justice Rose is disqualified because of animus toward their attorney. We elect to follow our holding in Hecht, and reject the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ainsworth v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  2. City of Las Vegas Downtown Redevelopment Agency v. HechtNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  3. City of North Las Vegas v. CluffNevada Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nevius v. WardenNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Nevius v. WardenNevada Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API