Whitacre Investment Co. v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Young, L:
The issue of whether Justice Robert Rose is disqualified because of animus toward Laura FitzSimmons, a party’s attorney, *1103was presented and decided in the recent case of Las Vegas Downtown Redev. Agency v. Hecht, 113 Nev. 644, 940 P.2d 134 (1997). Laura FitzSimmons is one of the attorneys for appellant Whitacre Investment Company, respondents Buckwalter, et al., and appellant C.B.M., Ltd. (collectively “movants”), and they again assert that Justice Rose is disqualified because of animus toward their attorney. We elect to follow our holding in Hecht, and reject the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ainsworth v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaNevada Supreme Court · 1989
- City of Las Vegas Downtown Redevelopment Agency v. HechtNevada Supreme Court · 1997
- City of North Las Vegas v. CluffNevada Supreme Court · 1969
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nevius v. WardenNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Nevius v. WardenNevada Supreme Court · 1998