Legal Opinion

Espinosa v. Haslam

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1935No. Civ. 10067Published

1Opinion of the Court

8 Cal.App.2d 213 (1935)

LEONARD O. ESPINOSA, Respondent,

v.

CARL W. HASLAM, Appellant.

Civ. No. 10067.

California Court of Appeals. Second Appellate District, Division Two.

June 29, 1935.

Charles F. Blackstock for Appellant.

Maxwell Nichols and A. W. Robertson for Respondent.

Fricke, J., pro tem.

Action for the death of a son, Raymond, twenty years of age, by reason of the wrongful act of defendant, brought under the authority of section 376 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which provides that "a father, or, in case of his death or desertion of his family, the mother, may maintain an action for the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frazzini v. CableCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. White v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Grierson v. GriersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Benton v. BentonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Espinosa v. HaslamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API