Wilson v. Cable News Network, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Dissent
ROTHSCHILD, P. J.—
I respectfully dissent.
Under the first prong of the anti-SLAPP statute, the defendants must establish that the challenged causes of action arise “from any act of [the defendants] in furtherance of the [defendants’] right of petition or free speech under the United States Constitution or the California Constitution in connection with a public issue.” (Code Civ. Proc., §425.16, subd. (b)(1).) Here, there is no dispute that when CNN reports the news to the public it is exercising its right of free speech under the First Amendment. (See Lieberman v. KCOP Television, Inc. (2003)…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. v. PaladinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Tuchscher Development Enterprises, Inc. v. San Diego Unified Port DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Freeman v. SchackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Lieberman v. KCOP Television, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Birkner v. LamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.