Legal Opinion

Pinto v. Town of Milford

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided August 10, 1999No. 942105Published

1Opinion of the CourtDonohue, J.

Upon receipt of allegations of rape, members of the Milford Police Department initiated a routine investigation of the plaintiff, Jose Pinto (“Pinto”). On June 11, 1993, the Grand Jury voted not to indict Pinto. Subsequently, Pinto brought the present case based on the following counts: Count I Malicious Prosecution, Count II Abuse of Process, Count III Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, Count IV Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress, Count V Massachusetts Civil Rights Violations under G.L.c. 12, §§11H & 111, Count VII Federal Civil Rights Violations under 42 U.S.C. §1983,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Agis v. Howard Johnson Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Daniel J. Roche Et Ux. Valerie Roche v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API