Legal Opinion

Esquivel v. Nancarrow

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1969No. 8597PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*211McFarland, justice:

Appellants David and Ophelia Esquivel brought this action to recover for the death of their three-and-a-half-year-old son “Rickey,” who was killed by an automobile driven by defendant Nancarrow.

Appellants list twelve assignments of error. The first two pertain to the admission of evidence to which they objected; the next five pertain to the trial court’s refusal to give requested instructions; the last five pertain to instructions given over appellants’ objections.

The accident took place at night, in Tucson, Arizona, on a dimly-lighted portion of Speedway Boulevard, which,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Layton v. RochaArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Butane Corporation v. KirbyArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ParrArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Guedon v. RooneyOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Gilbert v. QuinetArizona Supreme Court · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hamilton v. City Court of City of MesaArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Loof v. SandersAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Ruiz v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  4. Groener v. BriehlCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. Newell v. Town of Oro ValleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API