Pruitt v. Lambert
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swepston
This cause was heard by stipulation on bill and answer and comes to us on a direct appeal. The question involved is whether the Chancellor properly enjoined the Meat Cutters and Butchers’ Unions, A.F.L., C.I.O., from picketing the complainant’s place of business.
It is agreed by respective counsel that the operation of his store is purely intra-state and does not affect inter-state commerce in any way. It necessarily follows that Federal Labor Belations statutes have no application either with regard to the rights or responsibilities of the parties or with reference to the jurisdiction of -…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Milk Wagon Drivers Union, Local 753 v. Meadowmoor Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- American Federation of Labor v. SwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hughes v. Superior Court of Cal. for Contra Costa Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Alcoa v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union 760Tennessee Supreme Court · 1957
- Hood v. StaffordTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
- International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers v. American Metal Products Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964
- Martin v. DEALERS TRANSPORT COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. Knoxville Iron Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.