Goldner v. Wiener
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtIsadore Bookstein, J.
The motion to dismiss is based solely on the ground of failure to institute the action within due time as required by law. In its brief, the third-party defendant urges also the insufficiency of the third-party complaint. On this motion that matter is not before me for determination.
A third-party action, by way of indemnity, does not accrue until actual payment of the judgment rendered against the defendant and third-party plaintiff by the original plaintiff. (Satta v. City of New York, 272 App. Div. 782; cf. Clements v. Rockefeller, 189 Misc. 889; Prost v. City of New York, 190 Misc. 197;…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Crapo v. . City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Dick v. Sunbright Steam Laundry Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Clements v. RockefellerNew York Supreme Court · 1947
- Prost v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1947
3Cited by1 opinion
- Banco do Brasil v. CalhoonNew York Supreme Court · 1966