Banco do Brasil v. Calhoon
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBirdie Amsterdam, J.
Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint herein on the grounds of legal insufficiency, that the court does not have jurisdiction of the subject matter, and that the action is time-barred.
The complaint alleges, in substance, that plaintiffs time-chartered a vessel from the owner of the vessel, Alcoa International, Inc. (hereinafter “Alcoa”); that between June 22, 1961 and July 12, 1961, defendant engaged in activities in Port Arthur, Texas, which were designed to prevent the loading of the chartered vessel by causing the said vessel to be picketed; that the picketing was secondary picketing…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Benz v. Compania Naviera Hidalgo, S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Martin v. CurranNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- International Text Book Co. v. . ConnellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Gaines v. JacobsenNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Incres Steamship Co. v. International Maritime Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ginger Rogers v. Alberto Grimaldi, Mgm/ua Entertainment Co., and Pea Produzioni Europee Associate, S.R.L.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Veraldi v. American Analytical Laboratories, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Ginger Rogers v. Alberto Grimaldi, Mgm/ua Entertainment Co., and Pea Produzioni Europee Associate, S.R.L.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989