Legal Opinion
Motley v. Parks
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 21, 2004No. 02-56648PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BETTY B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Darla Motley brings this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action on behalf of herself and her infant son Juan Jamerson, claiming that the defendants unlawfully searched her home and used excessive force against her infant son. The defendants-appellees are Albert Ruegg, Gregory Kading, Daryl Gates, and Bernard Parks of the Los An-geles Police Department (LAPD); Guadalupe Sanchez, a California Parole Officer; and James Black and Larry Webster, who are federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF) agents (collectively, “the officers”). The officers claim qualified…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Fogarty v. GallegosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Bull v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Crowe v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Friedman v. BoucherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Costanich v. DEPT. OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICESCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.