Legal Opinion

Stinson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 1, 2004No. A03A2554PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

Following the trial court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea, Timothy Stinson appeals, contending that, although he signed a Drug Court Contract obligating him to undergo drug rehabilitation, he nonetheless retained the ability to withdraw his plea as a matter of right prior to being sentenced. For the reasons set forth below, we are constrained to agree and reverse.

The record shows that, on December 1, 1998, Stinson was charged with a violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act. On December 8, 1998, after Stinson had been fully informed of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ware v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  2. Davenport v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Farmer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  4. Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. StinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  2. Stinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Stinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. State v. StinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API