Legal Opinion

Stinson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 7, 2006No. A06A0274PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barnes, Judge.

We granted Timothy Stinson’s application for a discretionary appeal of his probation revocation. Stinson contends that the trial court erred in revoking his probation because he was not given credit for the time he spent in a Drug Court rehabilitation program. On this issue of first impression, we hold that a defendant who elects to plead guilty and undergo alternative treatment in a Drug Court program offered under OCGA § 16-13-2 (a) is not entitled to credit for time spent in treatment if he is subsequently terminated from the program and sentenced on his original crime. Thus…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Franklin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  2. Rush v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  3. Roland v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  4. State v. StinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  5. Slater v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fleming v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  2. Curry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. Curry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API