Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between S. T. Palay Textile Corp. & Trio Togs, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 7, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
The petitioner has moved to confirm an arbitration award (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1461) and the respondent has cross-moved (Civ. Prac. Act, § 117) to vacate it (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1462, snbd. 3). The motions are consolidated.
The transaction involved the sale of merchandise. The only issue raised in the papers submitted on both applications is whether the arbitrators were guilty of misconduct in refusing the respondent’s request for an adjournment of the hearing in order to produce a witness who was to testify as to relevant and material matters.
It appears that it was the claim of the respondent that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gervant v. New England Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- In re the Arbitration between John Post Construction Corp., & Good Humor Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1957
- In re NavarroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Woodco Manufacturing Corp. & G. R. & R. Manufacturing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Del Vecchio v. Del VecchioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969