Legal Opinion
In re Navarro
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 21, 1943PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
We think the arbitrators should have adjourned the hearings in order to afford the appellant an opportunity to secure evidence concerning the alleged excessive charges for freight. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1462, subd. 3.)
The judgment and orders should be reversed, with costs, and the matter remitted to the Special Term for further proceedings.
Untermyer, Bore and Cohn, ' JJ., concur; Martin, P. J., and Callahan, J., dissent and vote to affirm.
Judgment and orders reversed, with costs, and the matter remitted to the Special Term for further proceedings in accordance with opinion. Settle order on…
2Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Woodco Manufacturing Corp. & G. R. & R. Manufacturing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- In re the Arbitration between S. T. Palay Textile Corp. & Trio Togs, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962
- Del Vecchio v. Del VecchioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969