Dodd v. State

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was fined one dollar under a conviction for being drunk at a private house.

The evidence is sharply at issue on the question of appellant being drunk at the residence of Loflin, where, it is claimed by the State, he was in a state of intoxication. The information contains three counts: first, that appellant was intoxicated in the private house of Jim Loflin; second, that he was intoxicated in a public place, towit: in a public road; and, third, in a public place, towit: in the private residence of Jim Loflin, where people had then and there' assembled for…