Legal Opinion
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 11, 2002No. CIV. A. 01-1580(RCL), CIV. A. 01-1624(RCL), CIV. A. 01-1976(RCL)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
Now before the Court are several dis-positive motions in these related, but not consolidated, actions. In particular, each of the plaintiffs has filed a motion for summary judgment against the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. In the motions, the plaintiffs assert that there are not any disputed issues of material fact and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The FERC and the Intervenor-Defen-dants, 1 on the other hand, have filed their own motions for summary judgment…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State of Louisiana v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Metropolitan Washington Chapter, Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Hornbeck Offshore Services, L.L.C. v. SalazarDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2010
- Mirant Corp. v. Potomac Electric Power Co. (In Re Mirant Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2003
- The Williams Companies and Dynegy Midstream Services, Limited Partnership v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Devon Energy Corporation, Chevron U.S.A. Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.