Legal Opinion

Nevills v. H.E. Butt Grocery Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 15, 2001No. 09-00-435-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHN HILL, Justice (Assigned).

Marie Nevills appeals from a directed verdict resulting in a judgment that she take nothing in her suit against H.E. Butt Grocery Company d/b/a/ H.E.B. Pantry Foods for injuries that she sustained when she tripped over a stock cart that was being used to display black-eyed peas on New Year’s Day. Nevills contends in a single issue that the trial court erred by granting H.E. B.’s motion for directed verdict.

We reverse the judgment and remand for trial because the trial court erred by granting H.E. B’s motion for directed verdict since there was more than a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Keetch v. Kroger Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Joske v. IrvineTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. GonzalezTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Seideneck v. Cal Bayreuther AssociatesTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Parker v. Highland Park, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rape v. M.O. Dental LabCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  2. Brenda Gail Rape v. M.O. Dental Lab, Gerald W. Carter, Michael K. Zuber, and Lora Zuber, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API